Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Not mentioned,
THOMAS M.K – Appellant
Versus
GOVT. OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for act declarations. (Para 3) |
| 2. court's analysis of legislative entries. (Para 4) |
| 3. validity of provisions excluding civil court jurisdiction. (Para 6) |
| 4. petitioner's claims of property sales criticized. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-
‘’1. Issue mandamus order under Article 226 and declare with Articles246(1); 254(1)(2) of the Constitution of India to the respondents, that the Acts “ The Kerala State Co-operative Societies Act 1969” and “ The Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural Development Banks Act , 1984” are unconstitutional and illegal and so inconsistent and so void from the commencement and enactment of the Acts.
2. Issue mandamus order under Article 226 and declare with Articles227(1); 235; 246(1); 254(1)(2) of the Constitution of India that the “Cooperative Arbitration Court” and Jurisdiction made under “ The Kerala State Co-operative Societies Act 1969” and “ The Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural Development Banks Act , 1984” misused for banking are unconstitutional and illegal and so void from the commencement and enactment of the Acts.
3. Grand such other reliefs as this
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
