SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 49464

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Mr. Nitin Jamdar, CJ, Mr. Basant Balaji, J
Bachpan Bachao Andolan, Charitable Society – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7380 OF 2018 | WP(C) NO. 23669 OF 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri. Deepu Thankan, Smt. Ummul Fida, Smt. Lakshmi Sreedhar
For the Respondents: Shri. V. Manu, Special G.P. to A.G., Smt. Aparna S, Sri. Santhosh Mathew (Sr.)

The effective implementation of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is crucial for safeguarding children's rights, requiring timely action by state authorities to fill vacancies and enforce compliance with statutory mandates.

Headnote:(A) Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 - Sections 17, 28, 30, and 94 - Public interest writ petition seeking compliance with the Act - Court addresses shortcomings in implementation by state authorities, emphasizing responsibility to ensure children's rights and welfare - Directions issued to fill vacancies in child protection bodies, conduct regular inspections of Child Care Institutions, and establish timelines for compliance with the Act - Stress on the importance of social audits and timely publication of reports to uphold child welfare. (Paras 71-74)

(B) Implementation of Laws - The state must effectively implement laws regarding child rights and protection to avoid systemic failures and ensure justice for children - The need for timely action in filling vacancies within child protection agencies and maintaining standards of care in institutions was underscored. (Paras 17, 19, 22, 24)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners are advocates for children's rights, highlighting the state's failure to comply with existing juvenile justice laws and urging the court to compel adherence to government directives and ensure the effective functioning of child protection mechanisms. The petition calls for judicial intervention in light of persistent shortcomings.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that systemic failures in the juvenile justice system necessitate urgent actions to rectify implementation gaps, stressing that laws must translate into tangible actions for child justice.

Issues: The primary issues revolved around the inadequate implementation of juvenile justice laws, delays in filling critical positions, and the necessity of improved oversight and accountability within child welfare agencies.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that statutory provisions must be enforced effectively, directing state authorities to adhere to mandates for protecting children’s rights and ensuring proper functioning of juvenile justice mechanisms, thus reaffirming the judiciary's role in safeguarding public interest.

Result: The court directed the state of Kerala to implement several remedial measures within specified timelines to enhance the juvenile justice system's efficiency.

Table of Content
1. historical juvenile legislation in india (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. transition to modern juvenile justice post-independence (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. failure in juvenile justice system leads to pil (Para 17 , 18)
4. suo moto proceedings for juvenile justice compliance (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. court directives to improve juvenile justice implementation (Para 71 , 73 , 74)

J U D G M E N T

[WP(C) Nos.7380/2018 and 23669/2019]

(Dated this the 31st day of October 2025)

Basant Balaji J.,

“The hallmark of culture and advance of civilization consists in the fulfilment of our obligation to the young generation by opening all opportunities for every child to develop its personality and rise to its full stature, physical, mental, moral, and spiritual. It is the birth right of every child that cries for justice from the world.”

: - Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer

India has a wide range of laws to protect children and child protection is accepted as a core component of social development. However, the challenge lies in implementing the laws due to inadequate human resource capacity and quality prevention and rehabilitation services. As a result, millions of children are prone to violence, abuse, and exploitation. Violence takes place in all settings: at home, school, childcare institutions, work and in the community. Often violence is perpetrated by someone known to the child. As per the National Crime Records Bureau, last year, minors in the country committed a total of 30,555 crimes; Delhi is sixth on the list, with over 2,340 cases involving minors. In 2020, the cases registered against minors exceeded 2,643. This urges a call to the systems all over there for a strict implementation of laws prevailing in this regard.

PETITIONERS AND THE PRESENT PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION

2. The first Petitioner, Bachpan Bachao Andolan is a non-Governmental Organization working towards the eradication of anti-trafficking and anti- slavery, founded by the Nobel Peace Laureate Kailash Satyarthi, with a vision to protect and prevent children from all forms of exploitation. It aims to identify, liberate, rehabilitate, and educate children in servitude. The 2nd petitioner is a human rights activist and is the sole Petitioner before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Sampurna Behura v. Union of India , [2018 (4) SCC 433] wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court issued certain general directions to the Union of India and to all State governments for the proper implementation and functioning of the Juvenile Justice System in India.

3. The present Writ petition in public interest is filed before this Court seeking directions to the Respondents representing the State of Kerala, to comply with the order and direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sampurna Behura, and for other reliefs for the effective implementation of the Juvenile Justice System in India.

HISTORY OF JUVENILE LEGISLATIONS IN INDIA

4. It is proper to elucidate the juvenile legislations in India to have a better understanding of the context. The historical development of juvenile justice in India can be traced back to ancient times, where the concept of providing care and protection to children in need was prevalent in the Indian society. The same can be placed under two heads namely, pre-independent and the post-independent period.

(A) LEGISLATIONS IN PRE-INDEPENDENT INDIA

5. The first significant legislation concerning Juvenile Justice in India was the Apprentices Act of 1850. This Act marked the initial attempt to differentiate juveniles from adult criminals. Under this law, minors convicted of petty crimes were placed in apprenticeship programs rather than being sentenced to imprisonment. The idea was to rehabilitate and reform young offenders by providing them with vocational training, thereby enabling them to reintegrate into society.

6. Subsequently, the Reformatory Schools Act, 1897 was introduced to provide institutional care for juvenile offenders. This Act sent children to reform

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top