Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
V.JOHN PAULOSE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations detail property transfer and potential fraud. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 2. arguments on culpability and evidence presented. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. discussion on inherent powers and delay implications in proceedings. (Para 7 , 10) |
| 4. reiterates principles for quashing complaints. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. final dismissal of the quashing application confirmed. (Para 11) |
O R D E R
The petitioner is the seventh accused in C.C. No.
408/2022 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, North Paravur, which has arisen from Crime No. 498/2008 registered by the Vadakkekara Police Station, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 420 , 468 and 424 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 32 (A) of the Registration Act , 1908.
2. The crux of the prosecution case is that: the sixth accused is the husband of the defacto complainant (first respondent). The first accused persuaded the sixth accused to transfer the property belonging to the first respondent on the strength of a power of attorney executed by her in favour of her husband. Subsequently, the first accused sold the property to the accused 2 and 3. The sixth accused has received th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
