IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ALEXANDER BALAS – Appellant
Versus
STATION HOUSE OFFICER – Respondent
O R D E R
The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.804/2024 on the file of the Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Attingal, which arises out of Crime No.1052/2024 registered by the Attingal Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 .
2. The gist of the prosecution case is that the petitioner, who is running a loan consultancy business, with an intention to cheat the de facto complainant (3rd respondent), promised to clear the chitti transactions with Kerala State Financial Enterprises at Attingal Branch and deceived Rs.8,81,000/- from the 3rd respondent. However, the petitioner did not clear the chitti arrears and refused to return the said amount. Thus, the accused have committed the above offences.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, even if the allegations in Annexure-A1 FIR and Annexure-A2 final report are taken on face value, the same will not constitute the offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC . There is no material to substantiate that the de facto compl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.