SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 49927

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
SIRAG A G – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 12050 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.782/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.K.SUBHASH, SMT.JENI JOHN
For the Respondents: SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA

Directly approaching the High Court for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS without exceptional circumstances is discouraged.

Headnote:This is an application seeking anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court observes that the petitioner did not demonstrate exceptional circumstances to bypass the Sessions Court. The Hon'ble Apex Court established in Mohammed Rasal C v. State of Kerala that direct High Court applications for anticipatory bail are discouraged. The application for bail is rejected, allowing the petitioner to approach the Sessions Court.

Table of Content
1. high court discourages bypassing sessions court for anticipatory bail applications. (Para 1 , 3)
2. petitioner failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for direct high court approach. (Para 2)

K.BABU, J.

-------------------------------------

B.A.No.12050 of 2025 ----------------------------------------

Dated this the 6th day of November, 2025 O R D E R This is an application seeking anticipatory bail filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court directly for pre-arrest bail, without first approaching the Sessions Court for the said relief. The petitioner has not pleaded any exceptional circumstances that prevented him from approaching the Sessions Court concerned. In Mohammed Rasal C v. State of Kerala [Spl Leave to Appeal (Crl) No.6588/2025], the Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that though concurrent jurisdiction is conferred upon the Sessions Court and the High Court, the hierarchy of Court demands that no person seeking remedy under Section 482 of BNSS should be encouraged to directly approach the High Court. The observation of the Hon'ble Apex Court is extracted below:-

“6. We find that in this case, the petitioners had approached the High Court directly for pre-arrest bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, ' BNSS '),, without first approaching the Sessions Court for the said relief. We are of the opinion that though the concurrent jurisdiction is conferred upon the Sessions Court and the High Court to entertain a prayer for pre-arrest bail under of the (formerly, Section 438 CrPC), the hierarchy of Courts demands that no person seeking such remedy should be encouraged or allowed to directly approach the High Court for exercising jurisdiction under of the (formerly, Section 438 CrPC) by bypassing the jurisdiction of the concerned Sessions Court.”

3. In view of the fact that the petitioner has not placed any exceptional circumstances justifying him to directly approach this Court under Section 482 of the BNSS , the bail application stands rejected granting liberty to approach the Sessions Court concerned.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top