IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
AL AMEEN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing based on amicable settlement is permissible. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments show mutual agreement among parties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. judicial precedents support inherent jurisdiction for quashing. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioners are accused 1 to 4 in Crime No.1785/2022 registered by the Adoor Police Station, Pathanamthitta District, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the second respondent, who has executed Annexure-B affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the second respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The party respondent has no subsisting g
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.