Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RIJO VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to authorisation committee's orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding legality and authority. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. details of the emotional connection and its significance. (Para 10 , 11 , 15) |
| 5. procedural inadequacies noted by the court. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. outcome of the petition. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The 1st petitioner, who is a chronic kidney patient and the 2nd petitioner-Donor, challenge Exts.P12, P18 and P19 orders of respondents 1 and 3 and seek to issue a direction to the District Level Authorisation Committee for renal transplantation to grant approval to the case of the petitioners for donation of one kidney by the 2nd petitioner to the 1st petitioner in terms of their application.
2. The petitioners jointly filed Form-11 application for approval of transplantation of kidney in accordance with Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Rules , 2014. The Local Committee for Transplantation found the case as genuine and referred the case for approval of State Level Authorisation Committee as per Ext.P2. The police gave Ext.P3 Certificate of Altruism stating that the 2nd p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
