Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
VEENAA VINOD – Appellant
Versus
AUTHORISED OFFICER, UNION BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioners seek a challenge in Ext.P1, a notice under Section
13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act , 2002. The petitioner can take up all the contentions in the reply to the said notice. The Writ Petition is premature.
Without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to take up all the contentions legally available to them, the Writ Petition is closed.
Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
