SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 50718

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MOHAMMAD NIYAS U.A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 8153 OF 2025|CRIME NO.412/2021|CC NO.604 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.B.PREMOD, SHRI.RAJAN E. A, SHRI.ROY AKKARA
For the Respondents: SMT.KEERTHI M., SHRI.ARJUN RAJA P.C., SRI.M.P.SHIJU, SRI.A.VIPIN NARAYAN PP

Court can invoke inherent power to quash proceedings in non-heinous, private disputes to maintain harmony between parties.

Headnote:This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by the accused Nos.1,3,5 and 6 in Crime No.412/2021 of Chalissery Police Station, Palakkad, which is pending as CC. No.604/2021 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Pattambi. The petitioners argue the dispute is settled with the defacto complainant who affirmatively supports quashing the proceedings. The court recognized that the nature of the offences is private, indicating quashing of proceedings maintains harmony. The Criminal Miscellaneous Case is thus allowed.

Table of Content
1. dispute settled between parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. prosecutor supports quashing. (Para 5)
3. inherent powers for non-heinous crimes. (Para 6)

ORDER

This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 by the accused Nos.1,3,5 and 6 in Crime No.412/2021 of Chalissery Police Station, Palakkad, which is pending as CC. No.604/2021 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Pattambi. The offences alleged against the petitioners are punishable under Sections 498A and 323 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860

2. The prosecution case is that the 1st accused being the husband of the defacto complainant and the other accused being his relatives, subjected her to cruelty both physically and mentally on the ground of dowry and voluntarily caused hurt to her and thereby they alleged to have committed the aforesaid offences.

3. According to the petitioners, the dispute has been settled with the defacto complainant and they agreed to drop all further proceedings relating to the above dispute. Therefore, the petitioners prayed for quashing all further proceedings against them.

4. The Defacto complainant filed affidavit endorsing the averments in the Criminal MC. According to her, the case has been amicably settled and that she does not intend to proceed with the case and also that further proceedings in the case can be quashed. She has no further grievance against the petitioners.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, after getting instruction from the investigating officer also submitted that the dispute has been settled between the parties and that the victim is not at all interested in continuing the prosecution against the petitioners.

6. Considering the fact that the offence involved in this case are not heinous and very serious, but purely of private in nature and now the dispute has been settled between the parties, this is a fit case in which further proceedings can be quashed by invoking the inherent power of this court. Such a course is also required to maintain the harmonious relationship between the parties to a marriage and also to prevent abuse of process of the court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top