Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.RAKESH THAMBAN
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Dismissal of an O.P(Crl) as infructuous based on counsel's submission.

Headnote:The court analyzed the petitioner's submission regarding the matter becoming infructuous. The essential facts relate to the dismissal of an O.P(Crl) based on the counsel's claims. The court concluded that the case was no longer pertinent, leading to its dismissal. The primary issue concerns whether the O.P(Crl) could be dismissed due to its infructuous nature. The court reasoned that dismissal was warranted given the irrelevance of the matter in light of the submission. Consequently, the judgment states: 'This O.P(Crl) is dismissed as infructuous.'

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous and hence this O.P(Crl)

could be dismissed as infructuous.

In the light of the above submission, this O.P(Crl) is dismissed as infructuous.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :