Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
MANOJ.S – Appellant
Versus
SHAJIMON V.M – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge promotion denials based on seniority list. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented on the tribunal's handling of claims and representation. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. the necessity of addressing limitation before proceeding with claims. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. the order to remand for addressing limitations is confirmed. (Para 14) |
Judgment
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
Heard on the question of admission.
2. The present O.P.(KAT) filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated 8th September 2025 passed in O.A.(EKM) No.1279/2022 whereby the Original Application has been disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Annexures A6 to A8 representations. The second respondent shall afford an opportunity of hearing the applicants as well as respondents 6 to 43, except respondent No.37, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. It is made clear that the Tribunal has not adjudicated the matter on merits.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners are working as Livestock Inspectors Grade I under the second respondent, being aggrieved by th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
