Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY WORKERS UNION – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for condonation of delay requires adequate justification. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observations concerning the evidence of delay. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. evaluation of the bona fide nature of the application. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final decision based on lack of sufficient cause. (Para 8) |
O R D E R
P.V.BALAKRISHNAN,J C.M.Appln.1 of 2025 This is an application to condone the delay of 352 days in filing the Review Petition seeking review of the judgment dated
22.02.2024 passed by this Court in W.A.No.1032/2021.
2. The reasons stated by the applicants to condone the delay, as is reflected in the affidavit, are extracted below :
“3. The learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition by relegating the respondents 1 to 6, to approach the authorities under the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. Dissatisfied with the judgment the respondents 1 to 6 approached Hon'ble Division bench and the Hon'ble Division bench as per order dated 22.02.2021, allowed the appeal in-part. Dissatisfied with the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench the appellants approached the Hon'ble Supreme Court by filing SLP No.17102 of 2024. However, the SLP was dismissed as per order dated 09.08.2024, obser
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
