Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 50735

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
CHANDRIKA GOPI – Appellant
Versus
KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 22585 OF 2021 | WP(C) NO. 22657 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R.SANJITH, C.S.SINDHU KRISHNAH
For the Respondents: P.U.SHAILAJAN

Dismissal of writ petitions without prejudice allows petitioners future recourse if grievances remain.

Headnote:The petitions were dismissed as not pressed, meaning the court recognized a memo filed and dismissed both cases without prejudice to petitioners' rights to re-approach the court should grievances persist. The dismissal is clear that it doesn't affect future claims.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner in both cases submits that a not press memo has been filed to close these writ petitions.

Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed.

It is made clear that dismissal of the writ petitions will not stand in the way of the petitioners to approach this Court again, if any grievance subsists.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 50735

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JCHANDRIKA GOPI – AppellantVersusKERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. – RespondentWP(C) NO. 22585 OF 2021 | WP(C) NO. 22657 OF 2021

Dismissal of writ petitions without prejudice allows petitioners future recourse if grievances remain.

Headnote:The petitions were dismissed as not pressed, meaning the court recognized a memo filed and dismissed both cases without prejudice to petitioners' rights to re-approach the court should grievances persist. The dismissal is clear that it doesn't affect future claims.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
CHANDRIKA GOPI – Appellant
Versus
KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 22585 OF 2021 | WP(C) NO. 22657 OF 2021