IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
ANILA STANLY – Appellant
Versus
THE CANARA BANK – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:
“i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction, directing the 1st Respondent no to produce (sic) with the recovery of any amount in respect of loan account No.
0728651005209;
ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction, directing 2nd respondent to take appropriate action against the 1st respondent for not taking steps to drop the proceedings in respect of loan account No. 0728651005209;
iii) declare that the loan account No. 0728651005209 stands closed in the light of Ext. P5 and all further proceedings for recovery of any amount in respect of the loan is illegal;
iv) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction, directing 2nd respondent to meet 60% of the liability in respect of loan account No. 0728651005209;
v) to permit the petitioner to produce translations of the vernacular documents as and when directed by this Hon'ble Court;
vi) issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case;”
2. Pursuant to the direction issued by this Court on 28.07.2025 th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.