Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MIDHUN MOHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. amicable settlement allows for quashing of fir. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. consent from parties and public prosecutor supports quashing. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. inherent powers invoked due to nature of offences not being serious. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 4 in Crime No. 346/2025 registered by the Ernakulam Town North Police Station, Ernakulam District, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Section s 140 (2), 126, 296, 127(2), 115(2) and 351(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the second respondent, who has executed Annexure A2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the second respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of rela
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
