IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SASIKUMAR K. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused seeks quashing of charges. (Para 1) |
| 2. settlement reached, charges may not continue. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. court emphasizes quashing based on settlement and nature of offenses. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
O R D E R Dated this the 7th day of November, 2025 The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No. 279/2019 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Adoor, which has arisen from Crime No.2273/2018 registered by the Pandalam Police Station, Pathanamthitta alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 506(i) and 294(b) of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the second respondent, who has executed Annexure A2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the second respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.