Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
RAJAN, SUNILKUMAR N, MILAN S S, ALAN S S, JINO JUDS J B, JAYAKUMAR T – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners invoked inherent jurisdiction for quashing. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. both sides confirmed amicable settlement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. judiciary can quash based on previous rulings. (Para 6) |
| 4. determination about non-serious offences aims to uphold justice. (Para 7) |
O R D E R Dated this the 6th day of November, 2025 The petitioners are the accused 1 to 6 in Crime No.121/2025 registered by the Vattiyoorkavu Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 189 (2), 189(4), 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2) 118(1), 118(2), 351(3) and 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and also Sections 3 (2), 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 ( Amendment 2015).
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 2 and 3, who have executed Annexures A2 and A3 affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
