Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 50853
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
SARIKA T.S – Appellant
Versus
THE CENTRAL REGISTRY OF SECURITIZATION ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION AND SECURITY INTEREST OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 21544 OF 2024
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.GEORGE A.CHERIAN, SHRI.K.N.ABHILASH, SHRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT, SHRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (SR.), SHRI.JAISON MATHEW
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.GEORGE A.CHERIAN, SHRI.K.N.ABHILASH, SHRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT, SHRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (SR.), SHRI.JAISON MATHEW
The absence of representation from a petitioner during proceedings can lead to a dismissal for default as per procedural norms.
Headnote:The judgment delves into issues pertaining to default representation by the petitioner in a writ petition. The writ was brought forth under WP
(C) NO. 21544 OF 2024 but faced dismissal due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel on two occasions, leading to the court's conclusion that the petition be dismissed for default. The court definitively states, 'this writ petition is dismissed for default.'
JUDGMENT
(Dated this the 05th day of November, 2025)
On 29.10.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. A memo was filed by the counsel for the petitioner relinquishing the vakalath on 29.10.2025. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for default.
