Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, JOBIN SEBASTIAN, JJ
SUJI S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validating grounds of detention under the kaa(p) act. (Para 1 , 2 , 6) |
| 2. judicial review affirms the advisory board's process and rationale. (Para 3 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. arguments against the process and validity of the detention order. (Para 4 , 5 , 8) |
J U D G M E N T
Jobin Sebastian, J.
An order of detention dated 30.07.2025, passed against one Sajan @ Parunthu Sajan, S/o.Thankachan (the detenu), under Section 3 (1) of the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act , 2007 (‘KAA(P) Act’ for brevity), has been under challenge in this writ petition. The petitioner herein is the wife of the detenu. For the purpose of initiating the proceedings under the KAA(P) Act, the detenu was classified as a known rowdy as defined under Section
2(p)(iii) of the KAA(P) Act.
2. For passing the impugned detention order, the jurisdictional authority considered four cases in which the detenu was involved. Out of the said cases considered, the case registered against the detenu with respect to the last prejudicial activity is crime No.895/2025 of Kazhakuttom Police Station alleging commission of the offences punishable under Sections 2 96(b), 126(2), 118(1), 110, r/w 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
