Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ANEESH VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the conviction under specific ipc sections. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts surrounding the incident and the complainants' testimony. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. discussion on the settlement between parties. (Para 5) |
| 4. legal basis for the court's decision to quash conviction. (Para 7) |
ORDER
This revision petition has been filed challenging the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Sections 341 , 323 and 324 of IPC .
2. The petitioner was the accused in C.C.No.87/2018 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Thamarassery (for short, the trial court). He faced trial for the offences punishable under Sections 341 , 323 and 324 of the IPC .
3. The prosecution case in short is that on 4.8.2017 at 21.15 hours, PW1 and PW2 were going to their house at Vanakkav in an autorikshaw. When they reached Kanjamvayal, the motor cycle driven by PW3 which came from the opposite side fell by hitting on a hump and when PW1 and PW2 stopped the autorikshaw to help PW3, the accused who was standing there watching the incident came and beat PW3 on his face. When the accused again tried to beat PW3, PW2 prevented it and then the accused caught hold of the collar of the s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
