IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SHYJU P.S – Appellant
Versus
ANNIE. M. JOHN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to interim maintenance order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's reasonable assessment of maintenance. (Para 3) |
J U D G M E N T
This original petition has been filed challenging Ext.P7 interim order of maintenance.
2. The petitioner is the husband of the first respondent and the father of the second respondent. Respondents 1 and 2 have filed M.C. No.436/2023 against the petitioner before the Family Court, Neyyattinkara, claiming maintenance. The Family Court granted interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.4,000/- per month to the first respondent and Rs.3,000/- per month to the second respondent with effect from the date of the petition, that is, 17.10.2018. Though the order was passed on 04.07.2024, this original petition has been filed after a period of more than 18 months, that too, after filing of the execution petition.
3. The petitioner is admittedly employed in K.S.E.B. and is drawing substantial salary. Though the petitioner has taken up a contention that the first respondent is employed, there is absolutely no evidence to substantiate the same. Considering the requirements of respondents 1 and 2 and the means of the petitioner, the interim monthly maintenance g
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.