Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 50928

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
RAIHANATH P.K – Appellant
Versus
THE SUPERINTEDENT, CENTRAL PRISON AND CORRECTIONAL HOME THAVANUR – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 1480 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SHAIQ RASAL M.
For the Respondents: SRI.E.C.BINEESH-SR.PP

Emergency leave approval under criminal procedure confirms petition closure.

Headnote:The court analyzed the facts surrounding the issuance of emergency leave to the petitioner's husband under relevant criminal procedure provisions. The court found that leave had been approved, thus determining the writ petition was unnecessary. Key questions included the lawful authority of leave issuance and responses to petitions. Ultimately, the court ruled to close the writ petition.

J U D G M E N T

Sri.E.C.Bineesh, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that three days' emergency leave has already been granted to the petitioner's husband.

Hence, the writ petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 50928

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMDR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JRAIHANATH P.K – AppellantVersusTHE SUPERINTEDENT, CENTRAL PRISON AND CORRECTIONAL HOME THAVANUR – RespondentWP(CRL.) NO. 1480 OF 2025

Emergency leave approval under criminal procedure confirms petition closure.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
RAIHANATH P.K – Appellant
Versus
THE SUPERINTEDENT, CENTRAL PRISON AND CORRECTIONAL HOME THAVANUR – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 1480 OF 2025