SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 50976

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G.ARUN, J
M/S AMAL NEERAD PRODUCTIONS LLP – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 42229 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: V.HARISH, RAJAN VISHNURAJ, VARUN JACOB
For the Respondents: O.M.SHALINA

Judicial review allows for administrative decisions to be ordered to consider requests when procedural issues are raised in time-sensitive matters.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to WP

(C) No. 42229 of 2025 concerning the denial of a film production firm's opportunity to submit an entry for the 72nd National Film Awards due to alleged technical glitches affecting the registration process. The court finds that the authority must decide on the petitioner's request (Ext.P7) for reconsideration regarding application submission. The primary issues focus on whether the technical difficulties justify extending the deadlines for submissions. The court directs that the concerned authority respond to the petitioner's request within ten days of receiving a copy of the judgment.

Table of Content
1. denial of film award application due to technical issues. (Para 1 , 2)
2. technical glitches alleged by petitioner. (Para 3)
3. authority must address the petitioner's request. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 11th day of November, 2025

The petitioner, a film production firm, is aggrieved by the denial of opportunity to submit its entry for the 72nd National Film Awards, 2024.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s attempt to register in the official login portal was defeated due to technical glitches. Learned Counsel further submitted that the petitioner’s film ‘Bougainvillea’ regarding which the application was to be submitted, has been conferred with 7 awards in the Kerala State Film Awards. Therefore, denial of opportunity will not only affect the Production Company, but also the chance of the artists and technicians who have worked hard for the film’s overall success. Highlighting this aspect and seeking redressal, the petitioner had submitted Ext.P7 request on 31.10.2025, ie. the last day for submitting the application. The request remains unconsidered and hence the respondents should be directed to consider Ext.P7 in a time bound manner.

3. Learned DSGI submitted that the official portal was open from 10.10.2025 and Pan India publicity was given about the 72nd National Film Awards, 2024.

4. This Court cannot delve into the question whether the petitioner was prevented from submitting application due to a technical glitch. The petitioner having raised such an allegation and made a request to extend the time for accepting the application, the authority concerned has to take a decision at the earliest.

The writ petition is hence disposed of by directing the 2nd respondent to take up Ext.P7 request and pass a reasoned order thereon, adverting to the grounds urged by the petitioner. The order, as directed above, shall be issued within 10 days of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top