SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 50997

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MOLI @ USHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 3090 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.G.RANJU MOHAN, SRI.K.K.VIJAYAN
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

A criminal petition can be dismissed when the petitioner chooses not to pursue it further.

Headnote:The present case involves consideration under the Criminal Procedure Code, with reference to the petition submitted by the petitioner. The court acknowledged that the counsel for the petitioner submitted the case was not to be pursued, leading to the dismissal of the petition. The core issue was whether the action of not pursuing the appeal could lead to dismissal. The court noted the procedural aspect of dismissing a petition when it is not pressed, ultimately resulting in the dismissal as recorded.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Crl.M.C is not pressed. Accordingly, the Crl.M.C is dimissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top