Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ABDUL MUJEEB – Appellant
Versus
HABEEBA.K.P. – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 228 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C.C.ANOOP
For the Respondents: E.C.AHAMED FAZIL

The dismissal of the petition reflects that a case may become moot if the underlying issue is resolved.

Headnote:This judgment addresses the dismissal of OP (Crl) No. 228 of 2021 due to the resolution of the underlying matter. The petitioner argued for relief under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, as presented in Exhibit P1, but the petition became moot. The court framed the issue regarding the case's current relevance. Upon review, the court concluded, recognizing no further action was necessary and dismissed the petition as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the M.C has already been disposed of. In the above circumstances, this O.P (Crl) is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.PRATHEEP KUMAR, JABDUL MUJEEB – AppellantVersusHABEEBA.K.P. – RespondentOP(CRL.) NO. 228 OF 2021

The dismissal of the petition reflects that a case may become moot if the underlying issue is resolved.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ABDUL MUJEEB – Appellant
Versus
HABEEBA.K.P. – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 228 OF 2021