Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SEENA S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 214 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.A.S.SHAMMY RAJ
For the Respondents: SR.PP-SRI.A.VIPIN NARAYAN

A writ petition becomes infructuous when the investigation, which was the subject of the petition, is completed.

Headnote:The petition under WP(CRL.) NO. 214 OF 2022 involves the investigation outcomes by the police regarding prior complaints filed. The court determined that the case has become infructuous due to the completion of the investigation. The key issue framed is whether the writ petition retains relevance. The court found that, since the investigation concluded, there is no need for continuation leading to dismissal. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Police after investigation filed final report and as such the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.PRATHEEP KUMAR, JSEENA S – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(CRL.) NO. 214 OF 2022

A writ petition becomes infructuous when the investigation, which was the subject of the petition, is completed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SEENA S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 214 OF 2022