IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MUHAMMED HADIF – Appellant
Versus
FADHIL N. – Respondent
O R D E R Dated this the 14th day of November, 2025 The petitioners are the accused 1 and 2 in C.C.No.312/2024 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Payyoli, which has arisen from Crime No.701/2023 registered by the Payyoli Police Station, Kozhikode alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323 and 506(i)
r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the first respondent, who has executed Annexure 2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the first respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The first respondent has no subsisting grievance and does not wish to pursue the prosec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.