Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
VIJIL VIJAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner is accused under ipc sections and seeks quashing based on settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. various parties including the public prosecutor confirm the settlement and a lack of objections. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court lays down principles governing quashing based on the nature of the offences and the settlement. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
Dated this the 14th day of November, 2025 The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No31 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Paravur, which has arisen from Crime No.1634 of 2016 registered by the Chathannur Police Station, Kollam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 294, 341 and 323 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4, who have executed Annexures C &
D affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
