Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
AIN HONEY AROHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner accused seeks quashing of fir based on settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties report amicable resolution and absence of grievance. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court outlines inherent powers to quash proceedings in non-serious cases. (Para 6) |
| 4. quashing proceedings is justified to uphold justice and harmony. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.42 of
2025 registered by the Vanitha Police Station, Kozhikode alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure A2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
