Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
VISHNUPRASAD V.V. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash proceedings due to amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties resolved disputes with no objection to quashing. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court affirms ability to quash non-heinous offences. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
Dated this the 13th day of November, 2025 The petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No.1428 of 2025 registered by the Kalady Police Station, Ernakulam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 115(2) and 296(b)of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure A2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
