Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
NAJILA NAZAR – Appellant
Versus
DR. JASIM MUHAMMED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims of the petitioner regarding maintenance and reliefs. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's findings on monetary reliefs awarded in previous rulings. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. contentions surrounding the multiplier and fair provision. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. rejection of the petitioner's claim for gold ornaments. (Para 11 , 12) |
O R D E R
The common order passed by the Sessions Court, Kozhikode in Crl.R.P Nos.50/2018 and 55/2018 is under challenge in these petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C by the parties in those revision petitions. The aforesaid revision petitions arose out of the order passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III, Kozhikode in M.C No.156/2014 filed by a divorced Muslim lady claiming various reliefs under the provisions of Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (hereafter referred as ‘the Act’). For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred hereinafter in their capacities as petitioner and respondent as they appear in the proceedings before the Trial Court.
2. Before the Trial Court, the petitioner sought the following reliefs:
(i) Money equivalent to mahr given at the time of marriage (ii) Iddat expenses Rs
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
