Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SALHAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. amicable settlement between parties. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. disputes are resolved without objection. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's authority to invoke inherent powers. (Para 6) |
| 4. proceedings to be quashed for promoting harmony. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
Dated this the 10th day of November, 2025 The petitioner is the 3rd accused in C.C.No.786/2018 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakkanad, which has arisen from Crime No.423/2018 registered by the Thadiyittaparamba Police Station, Ernakulam, for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 448, 341, 323 and 427 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the respondents 2 and 3, who have executed Annexures A3 and A4 affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
