Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
NIHAL RASHEED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case summary on criminal charges. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the quashing of charges. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. evidence concern for grievous hurt clarification. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's reflections on inherent powers and quashing principles. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. final ruling and dismissal order. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
O R D E R Dated this the 7th day of November 2025 The petitioners are the accused 2 and 3 in C.C.No.295/2018 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta, which has arisen from Crime No.1103/2017 registered by the Sasthamcotta Police Station, Kollam, as against the accused persons for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 341 , 323, 324 and 326 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ).
2. The crux of the prosecution case is that, on
30.05.2017, at around 19 hours, the accused persons, in furtherance of their common intention, and personal animosity towards the 2nd respondent (de facto complainant) had wrongfully restrained him, assaulted him and caused grievous hurt to him. Thus, the accused have committed the above offences.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Publi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
