SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51677

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
PADMAJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R.RAJASREE
For the Respondents: SMT.SEETHA S, SR.PP

ORDER

Dated this the 06th day of November, 2025 The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.566/2021 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Sulthan Bathery (‘Trial Court’, in short), which has arisen from Crime No.1098/2020 registered by the Meenangadi Police Station, Wayanad, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 418, 427, 465, 468, 471 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The crux of the prosecution allegation is that, the petitioner, who was the Chairman of the renovation committee of Manikavu Mahadeva Temple, with an intention to misappropriate money from the devotees, printed different types of receipt books without the knowledge of the Malabar Devaswom Board and made unlawful gain. He also cut and removed 400 cubic feet of Ayani tree standing in the property. Thus the petitioner has committed the above offences.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, even if the allegations in Annexure A2 final report are taken on their face value, the same will not constitute the offences charged against the petitioner. There is no material

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top