JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a 6th semester law student at Mount Zion Law College and is pursuing his studies under the three year unitary LLB course. He appeared for his third semester exams based on Ext.P1 hall ticket. As regards the Compulsory Clinical Paper 1 – Drafting, Pleading, and Conveyancing, the Principal had a doubt about whether the petitioner could be permitted to redo that paper.

2. The Principal therefore raised a query through Ext.P2 mail and requested the University to intimate whether a student who had failed Compulsory Clinical Paper 1 – Drafting, Pleading, and Conveyancing, a wholly internal paper involving classroom exercises and test papers, can be permitted to Redo the exam. As the query was not answered by the University, the petitioner was not able to appear for that paper. The petitioner therefore, addressed a letter to the University seeking permission to appear for that paper and the University replied by Ext.P3, enjoining that, modifications had been brought to the internal/redo clinical papers of the Three-Year Unitary LLB Regulations based on the recommendations of the Board of Studies in Law. By reason of the modification, the supplementary chance for