IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M. Manoj, J
M.Ashraf – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary Chokkad Grama Panchayath – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 23 rd day of October, 2025 The writ petition is preferred by an ‘A’ class Government Contractor, who entered into an agreement with the 1st respondent for conducting the work, namely, “Jalanidhi II – LWSS/bulk water supply scheme to Chokkad Grama Panchayat”. During the work, the petitioner has submitted 1st part, 2nd, 4th and 5th part bills, which were settled by the respondents. The total amount payable to the petitioner comes to Rs. 1,00,82,574/-.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that, despite the 3rd respondent having declared the project successfully completed by Ext.P5 order, the Panchayat has not released the funds that were handed over to it by the 3rd respondent. This is the circumstance in which this writ petition has been filed.
3. The petitioner has also filed another writ petition - WP(C) No.30441 of 2019 challenging the second resolution passed by the Panchayat on 29.08.2019. In that resolution, the Panchayat decided not to recommend payment to the contractor on the ground that the work had not been satisfactorily completed.
4. The primary objection raised by the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent Panchayat is that Ext.P5 completion certifica
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.