Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
NASRU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application filed under bnss for bail. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations of conspiracy and ransom. (Para 3) |
| 3. petitioner argues for bail based on investigation status. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. opposition by public prosecutor. (Para 7) |
| 5. granting bail based on judicial observations. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
This is an application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ), 2023.
2. The petitioner is accused No.14 in Crime No.428 of
2025 of Pandikad Police Station. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 127 (3), 140(1), 61(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351(3), 111 and 311 r/w Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 ( for short ‘ BNS ’).
3. The prosecution case, as narrated in Annexure 1 order reads thus:
“On 12.08.2025, at 19.52 hours, at Pandikkad Amsom, in front of Pandikkad Tourist Home owing to certain financial transactions between accused No.1 and the husband of the defacto complainant while abroad, and with the intention of eliminating the said husband, accused Nos.1 to 17 criminally conspired together, kidnapped him, wrongfully detained him, and thereafter assaulted him with hands and weapons while demanding ransom money. ” [si
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
