Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
P. ABDUL SHUKKOOR – Appellant
Versus
KUMARAPURAM MUSLIM JAMA-ATH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge of the tribunal's order by the appellant. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's decision to not interfere with the tribunal's stay order and expedite the hearing of the w.o.a. (Para 3 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties regarding the urgency and merits of the case. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The 3rd respondent in W.O.A. No.14 of 2025 on the file of the Wakf Tribunal, Kozhikode, (the ‘Tribunal’, in short) filed this M.F.A. (Wakf) challenging the order dated 13.03.2025 passed by the Tribunal in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in that W.O.A.
2. W.O.A. No.14 of 2025 was filed by respondents 1 to 3 herein challenging Annexure A2 order dated 06.02.2025 issued by the 5th respondent Divisional Wakf Officer of the Kerala State Wakf Board ( the ‘Board’, in short). Respondents 1 to 3 have also filed I.A.No. 1 of 2025 in that W.O.A. for staying Annexure A2 order till the disposal of the W.O.A. By the impugned order dated 13.03.2025, the Tribunal allowed I.A.No.1 of 2025, staying the operation of Annexure A2 order. Being aggrieved, the 3rd respondent filed this M.F.A.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant, the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 and the learn
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
