Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
SMT.THRESSIA ANTONY MACHINGAL – Appellant
Versus
M/S. SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43817 OF 2025
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 21st day of November, 2025 The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the writ petition is not pressed, in view of the fact that two among the respondents have been omitted to be impleaded. The learned Counsel seeks liberty to file a fresh one.
Accordingly, this writ petition would stand dismissed as not pressed. The liberty sought for by the petitioner is granted.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
