SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51949

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ANOOBKHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR, SRI.SUNIL J.CHAKKALACKAL, SMT.RESHMA K.RAJU, SMT.G.BINDU, SMT.ANJANA R.S.
For the Respondents: SMT.BINDU O.V., SR.PP

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was already acquitted by the Trial Court. Therefore, this W.P (Crl) has become infructuous. Hence, this W.P (Crl) is dismissed as iinfructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top