Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51956

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
SABU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 3817 OF 2020

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.NIDHEESH
For the Respondents: SRI.V.S.SHIRAZ BAVA, SRI RENJIT GEORGE, SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Permission to withdraw a petition allows for a future challenge to the final report.

Headnote:In the case concerning CRL.MC NO. 3817 OF 2020, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw a petition regarding Crime No. 89/2020, allowing room for a future challenge to the final report. The court acknowledged the withdrawal and dismissed the petition while leaving the option to contest the final report open.

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition, leaving open the option to challenge the final report filed in this case. Permission is granted.

The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51956

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMG. GIRISH, JSABU – AppellantVersusTHE STATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 3817 OF 2020

Permission to withdraw a petition allows for a future challenge to the final report.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
SABU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 3817 OF 2020