Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51960

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
HARIKUMAR N. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 7864 OF 2019

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.RAJEEV, SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN, SRI.V.VINAY, SRI.D.FEROZE, SHRI.ANAND KALYANAKRISHNAN
For the Respondents: SRI.S.JUSTUS

The court closed the Criminal M.C. as it was deemed infructuous based on the petitioner's submissions.

Headnote:In accordance with the legal submission of the counsel, the Court observed that the Criminal M.C. was no longer necessary as the matter had become infructuous. Thus, it was determined that the case could be closed based on this condition, with the petitioners' counsel asserting that further proceedings were unwarranted.

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this Crl.M.C.

need not be continued, since the matter has become infructuous.

Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Crl.M.C. is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51960

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMG. GIRISH, JHARIKUMAR N. – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 7864 OF 2019

The court closed the Criminal M.C. as it was deemed infructuous based on the petitioner's submissions.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
HARIKUMAR N. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 7864 OF 2019