SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51961

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
SANDEEP, SUNOJ, RAHUL, SANDEEP, SREEKUMAR @ SREKUTTAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 7865 OF 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOHN JUDE ISSAC
For the Respondents: SRI.V.S.ULLASNATHAN

A petition can be withdrawn if the underlying matter has been resolved by the lower court.

Headnote:The Criminal Miscellaneous Case examines the procedural aspects following the disposal of the relevant matter by the Trial Court. The petitioners' counsel stated the Crl.M.C. is unpressed. The court records this submission and closes the case accordingly.

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this Crl.M.C.

is not pressed, since the matter had already been disposed of by the Trial Court.

Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Crl.M.C. is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top