Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J
SASIKALA P.S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's qualifications and appointment as accredited engineer. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. respondents' rationale for termination. (Para 7 , 10) |
| 3. court evaluation of the procedural compliance. (Para 9 , 12 , 16) |
| 4. court's determination on qualifications and appointment process. (Para 11 , 14 , 17) |
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The petitioner seeks to retain her as Accredited Engineer in the 4th respondent-Panchayat. 2. The petitioner was originally appointed as Overseer in the Puramattam Grama Panchayat in March, 2010. The appointment was under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. The appointment was on a contract basis. Agreement was executed for a period of two years, which was renewed from time to time based on performance appraisal.
3. While so, a vacancy of Accredited Engineer arose in the 4th respondent-Panchayat. Overseers with 10 years experience were eligible to apply. The petitioner applied for the post and was selected. She executed an agreement with the 4th respondent in September, 2021. After performance appraisal, a new agreement was executed in October, 2023.
4. The petitioner was asked to execute a new agreement
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
