IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
R.L MEENAGANAPATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
(i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the 2nd respondent or any other officer concerned to consider and dispose of Ext-P2 application pending before him, within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P2 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules , 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 5th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P2 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised O period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 2nd respondent/Authorised O to consider the Ext.P2 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.