SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51965

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
R.L MEENAGANAPATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43772 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The court mandates timely consideration of applications under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, ensuring adherence to statutory obligations.

Headnote:The petition under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act seeks a mandamus for timely consideration of an application pending with the respondent. The court finds merit in the request and directs the authorities to act in accordance with time frames. Main issues include the lawful authority's obligation to address pending requests appropriately and expeditiously. The case concludes with orders for completion and consideration within specified periods.

Table of Content
1. request for timely application processing. (Para 1 , 2)
2. heard both sides. (Para 3)
3. direction for consideration within stipulated times. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

(i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the 2nd respondent or any other officer concerned to consider and dispose of Ext-P2 application pending before him, within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.

[SIC]

2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P2 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules , 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 5th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P2 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised O period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 2nd respondent/Authorised O to consider the Ext.P2 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 5th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 2nd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 5th respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top