Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SANTHOSH BALAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court directed timely assessment of land application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. hearing both parties led to a judicial determination. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
I. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibit-P2, application (in form number 6) dated 30.10.2025 submitted by the petitioner before the first respondent under section 27 A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 for using the land for other purpose within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble court."
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P2 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 2nd respondent is directed to submit the necessary
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
