Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
SOUNDARYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. evaluation of claims for compassionate appointments. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dependency claims from widow and daughter. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties regarding claims. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's assessment of practicalities and policy intent. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. final ruling against noc requirement. (Para 12) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
P.V.BALAKRISHNAN, J
These writ appeals have been filed challenging the judgment dated 13.02.2025 passed in W.P.(C)Nos.44209 of 2023 & 38577 of 2023.
2. W.A.No.429 of 2025 is filed by the writ petitioner in 38577 of 2023 and W.A.No.503 of 2025 is filed by the writ petitioner in W.P. (C)No.44209 of 2023 challenging the judgment mentioned afore.
3. The facts in brief, as are necessary for the disposal of these writ appeals, are as follows:
The writ petitioner in W.P.(C) No.38577 of 2023, Ms.Soundarya, is the daughter of one late Sri.Sreekumar P.N., in his first wife. The writ petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 44209 of 2023, Smt.Geetha Devi, is the second wife of the said late Sreekumar. Sri.Sreekumar P.M. died in harness on 16.11.2022 while working as a Security Guard in the respondent bank. Both the writ petitioners raised a claim for appoin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
