SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51976

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
HAREENDANATH.C. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WA NO. 1783 OF 2017 | WPC NO.10866 OF 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN
For the Respondents: K P HARISH

A writ appeal can be dismissed as infructuous when the circumstances render the case irrelevant.

Headnote:The case concerns the appeal concerning a writ petition dismissed by the High Court of Kerala, relating to several respondents. The primary finding concluded that the writ appeal is infructuous, and the Court proceeded to dismiss the appeal. The issue addressed was whether the circumstances of the case warranted the appeal's continuation. Thus, the Court reasoned that the matter had become irrelevant. The Court consequently ordered the dismissal as infructuous.

Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikar i , J.

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that this writ appeal is rendered as infructuous.

Accordingly, the same is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top