Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.REKHA NAIR, SMT.S.SURAJA
For the Respondents: SHRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH, SMT.NIMMY JOHNSON

Dismissal of a writ petition due to it becoming infructuous after petitioner's counsel submits the matter is no longer relevant.

Headnote:In this case, the petitioner sought relief through a writ petition regarding issues linked to local self-government as per the Keral Town and Country Planning Act, 2016. The petitioner’s counsel indicated that the matter had become infructuous, leading the court to dismiss the writ petition as such. The court summarized that the submission by the counsel rendered any further proceedings unnecessary. The final ruling was that the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :