SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51997

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
PRADEEP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRVUNANTHAPURAM – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR, SMT.KEERTHI K.NARAYANAN, SMT.BHADRA S.P., SMT.ATHIRA B.
For the Respondents: ADV.DEEPA NARAYANAN – SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 20th day of November, 2025 The short grievance of the petitioner is that Exts.P6 and P7 representations preferred before the Village Officer and Tahsildar seeking remittance of tax has not been considered and acted upon.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents, this Court directs the 3rd respondent/Village Officer to take action in Ext.P6 representation preferred by the petitioner seeking remittance of tax in accordance with law, expeditiously at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner will produce a copy of the judgment before the

3rd respondent, for compliance.

The Writ Petition (Civil) is disposed of as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top